Big COHA logo
           
COHA Overview What's new on COHA COHA tour COHA site map Contact COHA staff
 
   Analysis by state
   Analysis by class I
   Analysis by region
   Descriptive maps
   Backtrajectories
   Trends analysis
   PMF Modeling
   Episode analysis
   Dust analysis
   Tribal analysis
   Fish & Wildlife
   Terms & acronyms
For best results,
please use:
Internet Explorer 5
(or higher)
Netscape 6
(or higher)
more info...
Cluster Analysis
 
 

Amalgamation or Linkage Rules

At the first step, when each object represents its own cluster, the distances between those objects are defined by the chosen distance measure. However, once several objects have been linked together, we need a linkage or amalgamation rule to determine when two clusters are sufficiently similar to be linked together. The major linkage rules include:

Single linkage (nearest neighbor). In this method the distance between two clusters is determined by the distance of the two closest objects (nearest neighbors) in the different clusters. This rule will, in a sense, string objects together to form clusters, and the resulting clusters tend to represent long "chains."

Complete linkage (furthest neighbor). In this method, the distances between clusters are determined by the greatest distance between any two objects in the different clusters (i.e., by the "furthest neighbors"). This method usually performs quite well in cases when the objects actually form naturally distinct "clumps." If the clusters tend to be somehow elongated or of a "chain" type nature, then this method is inappropriate.

Unweighted pair-group average. In this method, the distance between two clusters is calculated as the average distance between all pairs of objects in the two different clusters. This method is also very efficient when the objects form natural distinct "clumps," however, it performs equally well with elongated, "chain" type clusters.

Weighted pair-group average. This method is identical to the unweighted pair-group average method, except that in the computations, the size of the respective clusters (i.e., the number of objects contained in them) is used as a weight. Thus, this method (rather than the previous method) should be used when the cluster sizes are suspected to be greatly uneven.

Unweighted pair-group centroid. The centroid of a cluster is the average point in the multidimensional space defined by the dimensions. In a sense, it is the center of gravity for the respective cluster. In this method, the distance between two clusters is determined as the difference between centroids.

Weighted pair-group centroid (median). This method is identical to the previous one, except that weighting is introduced into the computations to take into consideration differences in cluster sizes (i.e., the number of objects contained in them). Thus, when there are (or one suspects there to be) considerable differences in cluster sizes, this method is preferable to the previous one.

Ward's method. This method is distinct from all other methods because it uses an analysis of variance approach to evaluate the distances between clusters. In short, this method attempts to minimize the Sum of Squares (SS) of any two (hypothetical) clusters that can be formed at each step. In general, this method is regarded as very efficient, however, it tends to create clusters of small size.