| STAR1
|
|
Table 1. STAR1 ammonium sulfate trajectory
regression attribution
assessment using a zero intercept. |
|
|
|
Intercept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NwOregon |
0.1546 |
0.0246 |
21.7 |
3.5 |
21.7 |
0.0000 |
|
Pacific Coast |
0.1106 |
0.0339 |
15.5 |
4.8 |
37.3 |
0.0012 |
|
SwOregon |
0.1034 |
0.0253 |
14.5 |
3.6 |
51.8 |
0.0001 |
|
Pacific Ocean |
0.1025 |
0.0314 |
14.4 |
4.4 |
66.2 |
0.0012 |
|
Washington |
0.0905 |
0.0218 |
12.7 |
3.1 |
78.9 |
0.0000 |
|
Canada |
0.0410 |
0.0127 |
5.8 |
1.8 |
84.7 |
0.0014 |
|
SeOregon |
0.0360 |
0.0127 |
5.1 |
1.8 |
89.8 |
0.0049 |
|
Idaho |
0.0263 |
0.0119 |
3.7 |
1.7 |
93.5 |
0.0278 |
|
SWUS |
0.0092 |
0.0042 |
1.3 |
0.6 |
94.7 |
0.0290 |
|
Nevada |
0.0021 |
0.0063 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
95.0 |
0.7392 |
|
Mexico |
-0.0026 |
0.0032 |
-0.4 |
0.4 |
94.7 |
0.4183 |
|
NWUS |
-0.0033 |
0.0066 |
-0.5 |
0.9 |
94.2 |
0.6213 |
|
NeOregon |
-0.0089 |
0.0116 |
-1.3 |
1.6 |
93.0 |
0.4428 |
|
California |
-0.0108 |
0.0132 |
-1.5 |
1.9 |
91.5 |
0.4148 |
|
|
Table 2. STAR1 ammonium sulfate trajectory regression attribution
assessment including an intercept. |
|
| Source Regions |
Contributions (ug/m3) |
Uncertainty (ug/m3) |
Fraction (%) |
Uncertainty (%) |
Cumulative (%) |
Significance (p value) |
|
|
Intercept |
0.4736 |
0.0545 |
66.6 |
7.7 |
66.6 |
0.0000 |
|
NwOregon |
0.1001 |
0.0230 |
14.1 |
3.2 |
80.6 |
0.0000 |
|
Pacific Coast |
0.0791 |
0.0306 |
11.1 |
4.3 |
91.7 |
0.0102 |
|
SwOregon |
0.0038 |
0.0254 |
0.5 |
3.6 |
92.3 |
0.8816 |
|
Pacific Ocean |
-0.0123 |
0.0311 |
-1.7 |
4.4 |
90.5 |
0.6926 |
|
Washington |
0.0610 |
0.0199 |
8.6 |
2.8 |
99.1 |
0.0023 |
|
Canada |
0.0140 |
0.0118 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
101.1 |
0.2369 |
|
SeOregon |
0.0211 |
0.0115 |
3.0 |
1.6 |
104.0 |
0.0680 |
|
Idaho |
0.0193 |
0.0107 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
106.8 |
0.0727 |
|
SWUS |
0.0086 |
0.0037 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
108.0 |
0.0228 |
|
Nevada |
0.0002 |
0.0057 |
0.0 |
0.8 |
108.0 |
0.9743 |
|
Mexico |
-0.0008 |
0.0028 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
107.9 |
0.7833 |
|
NWUS |
-0.0046 |
0.0059 |
-0.7 |
0.8 |
107.2 |
0.4330 |
|
NeOregon |
-0.0220 |
0.0105 |
-3.1 |
1.5 |
104.1 |
0.0371 |
|
California |
-0.0294 |
0.0120 |
-4.1 |
1.7 |
100.0 |
0.0148 |
|
|
Table 3. STAR1 aerosol extinction trajectory regression attribution
assessment using a zero intercept. |
|
| Source Regions |
Contributions (1/Mm) |
Uncertainty (1/Mm) |
Fraction (%) |
Uncertainty (%) |
Cumulative (%) |
Significance (p value) |
|
Intercept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SwOregon |
8.6683 |
1.9736 |
30.1 |
6.8 |
30.1 |
0.0000 |
|
NeOregon |
4.2830 |
0.9051 |
14.9 |
3.1 |
44.9 |
0.0000 |
|
Washington |
4.0764 |
1.7017 |
14.1 |
5.9 |
59.0 |
0.0172 |
|
Pacific Ocean |
3.6849 |
2.4514 |
12.8 |
8.5 |
71.8 |
0.1338 |
|
Canada |
2.0777 |
0.9903 |
7.2 |
3.4 |
79.0 |
0.0367 |
|
NwOregon |
2.0182 |
1.9224 |
7.0 |
6.7 |
86.0 |
0.2946 |
|
SeOregon |
1.9147 |
0.9903 |
6.6 |
3.4 |
92.7 |
0.0541 |
|
California |
1.5409 |
1.0279 |
5.3 |
3.6 |
98.0 |
0.1349 |
|
Nevada |
0.4724 |
0.4939 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
99.6 |
0.3396 |
|
NWUS |
0.3813 |
0.5133 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
101.0 |
0.4581 |
|
Mexico |
0.2160 |
0.2463 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
101.7 |
0.3812 |
|
SWUS |
-0.0505 |
0.3258 |
-0.2 |
1.1 |
101.5 |
0.8770 |
|
Idaho |
-0.2122 |
0.9301 |
-0.7 |
3.2 |
100.8 |
0.8197 |
|
Pacific Coast |
-2.8573 |
2.6432 |
-9.9 |
9.2 |
90.9 |
0.2805 |
|
|
Table 4. STAR1 aerosol extinction trajectory regression attribution
assessment including an intercept. |
|
| Source Regions |
Contributions (1/Mm) |
Uncertainty (1/Mm) |
Fraction (%) |
Uncertainty (%) |
Cumulative (%) |
Significance (p value) |
|
